UPDATED: 04-03-26 10:21 PDT

men Monmouth 1
  
Monmouth              
W-L: ( 5- 4) PR = 89.4805

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 206 A Manhattan MAAC ( 2- 7, 86.7) 15- 9 214 A LIU NEC ( 7- 1, 90.5) 8- 9 217 H Wagner NEC ( 4- 5, 85.7) 15- 7 224 H St Josephs A10 ( 5- 3, 94.5) 228 H Mt St Marys MAAC ( 2- 7, 86.7) 14- 5 303 A NJIT AE ( 3- 6, 89.4) 5- 9 307 A VMI NEC ( 4- 5, 86.7) 8- 9 314 A Drexel CAA ( 5- 4, 92.2) 8-12 321 A Hofstra CAA ( 1- 7, 88.6) 13-12 328 H Hampton CAA ( 0- 8, 81.7) 20-10 404 A Towson CAA ( 6- 3, 95.7) 411 H Stony Brook CAA ( 4- 4, 91.8) 425 H Fairfield CAA ( 4- 6, 91.4)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   206 A Manhattan              15- 9       6     2    +      3.02
   214 A LIU                     8- 9      -1    -2           0.79
   217 H Wagner                 15- 7       8     5           0.44
   228 H Mt St Marys            14- 5       9     4           1.44
   303 A NJIT                    5- 9      -4    -1    -     -3.30
   307 A VMI                     8- 9      -1     2    -     -2.95
   314 A Drexel                  8-12      -4    -4          -0.42
   321 A Hofstra                13-12       1     0           0.97
   328 H Hampton                20-10      10     9           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   303 A NJIT                    5- 9      -4    -1    -     -3.30
   307 A VMI                     8- 9      -1     2    -     -2.95

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   206 A Manhattan              15- 9       6     2    +      3.02

Monmouth Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Air Force Air Force   Air Force
Albany Albany insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Albany
Army Army   Army
Bellarmine Monmouth tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Monmouth
Binghamton Monmouth tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Monmouth
Boston Univ Boston Univ   Boston Univ
Brown Brown   Brown
Bryant Monmouth   Monmouth
Bucknell Bucknell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bucknell
Canisius Monmouth   Monmouth
Cleveland State Monmouth insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Monmouth
Colgate Colgate   Colgate
Cornell Cornell   Cornell
Dartmouth Dartmouth   Dartmouth
Delaware Delaware   Delaware
Denver Denver   Denver
Detroit Mercy Monmouth insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Monmouth
Drexel Drexel Drexel  
Duke Duke   Duke
Fairfield Fairfield tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Fairfield
Georgetown Georgetown   Georgetown
Hampton Monmouth Monmouth  
Harvard Harvard   Harvard
High Point High Point insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) High Point
Hobart Hobart   Hobart
Hofstra Monmouth Monmouth  
Holy Cross Holy Cross tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Holy Cross
Iona Iona   Iona
Jacksonville Jacksonville insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Jacksonville
Johns Hopkins Johns Hopkins   Johns Hopkins
Lafayette Lafayette insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Lafayette
Le Moyne Monmouth tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Monmouth
Lehigh Lehigh   Lehigh
LIU LIU LIU  
Loyola Loyola   Loyola
Manhattan Monmouth Monmouth  
Marist Marist tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Marist
Marquette Marquette   Marquette
Maryland Maryland   Maryland
Massachusetts Massachusetts insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Massachusetts
UMassLowell Monmouth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Monmouth
Mercer Mercer insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Mercer
Mercyhurst Monmouth insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Monmouth
Merrimack Monmouth tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Monmouth
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Mt St Marys Monmouth Monmouth  
Navy Navy insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Navy
NJIT NJIT NJIT  
North Carolina North Carolina   North Carolina
Notre Dame Notre Dame   Notre Dame
Ohio State Ohio State   Ohio State
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania   Pennsylvania
Penn State Penn State   Penn State
Princeton Princeton   Princeton
Providence Providence   Providence
Queens Monmouth insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) Monmouth
Quinnipiac Monmouth   Monmouth
Richmond Richmond   Richmond
Robert Morris Robert Morris   Robert Morris
Rutgers Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Rutgers
Sacred Heart Sacred Heart insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 5- 0) Sacred Heart
Siena Siena tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Siena
St Bonnies Monmouth   Monmouth
St Johns Monmouth tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Monmouth
St Josephs St Josephs insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) St Josephs
Stony Brook Stony Brook tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Stony Brook
Syracuse Syracuse   Syracuse
Towson Towson insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Towson
UMBC Monmouth insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Monmouth
Utah Utah   Utah
Vermont Vermont insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Vermont
Villanova Villanova insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Villanova
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
VMI VMI VMI  
Wagner Monmouth Monmouth  
Yale Yale   Yale

PowerWise = 20


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.81

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Manhattan       ( 2- 7, 86.7)    15- 9      -13.22       4.98       0.82         0.98             5.67
   0 A LIU             ( 7- 1, 90.5)     8- 9       -9.44       8.75       0.82         0.98            -8.44
   0 H Wagner          ( 4- 5, 85.7)    15- 7      -14.16       4.03      -0.82         0.98             3.15
   0 H Mt St Marys     ( 2- 7, 86.7)    14- 5      -13.16       5.04      -0.82         0.98             4.13
   0 A NJIT            ( 3- 6, 89.4)     5- 9      -10.53       7.67       0.82         0.98            -9.51
   0 A VMI             ( 4- 5, 86.7)     8- 9      -13.19       5.01       0.82         0.98           -12.10
   0 A Drexel          ( 5- 4, 92.2)     8-12       -7.66      10.54       0.82         0.98            -6.69
   0 A Hofstra         ( 1- 7, 88.6)    13-12      -11.26       6.94       0.82         0.98             7.58
   0 H Hampton         ( 0- 8, 81.7)    20-10      -18.20       1.00      -0.82         0.98             0.18
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -16.03

winning pts = 20.7138 losing points = -36.7389

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------